Friday, 9 September 2011

Betting on the Buddha

When I was 12 years old I had what would prove to be the single most important experience in my quest for God. I took a book out of the library called: “Religions of the World”: I can still remember the cover like this all happened yesterday. I took it home and began to wade through it till I came across the chapter on Buddhism. The stories struck a nerve, and not a good one. Being a self-righteous Catholic, even at that early age, I found the stories hilarious. Surely they were joking?
When my father came home he found me giggling in my chair. “Have you heard about Buddhism?” I asked him. “Some fat guy sat under a tree for twenty years, invented a religion and a bunch of stupid people follow it!” *giggle, giggle.*He just made it up!” *giggle, giggle.*

My father, being the interminably patient and compassionate man he was, patted me on the head and said: “Son, don’t judge what you don’t understand.

Don’t judge what you don’t understand.
                Don’t judge what you don’t understand.
                                                                                    Don’t judge what you don’t understand.

These words still haunt me. I felt like an idiot. I felt like a self-righteous ass, and as my father continued his walk down the passage to visit “the reading room”, I stood in the passage, book in hand, speechless.
That day was a crucial turning point for me. I took the book, made a cup of tea, sat back down in my chair, and read the chapter again. I didn’t understand a word of it. Looking past the cosmetics of Buddhism and into what they actually believed and practiced was like reading about an alien civilization. But what would a 12 year old middle class white South African kid know about suffering? I wouldn’t be in a place to even begin understanding for another 7 years.
*******************************************************************
I continued to be a good Catholic right up until my father died; and a good Catholic I was! I played in the band, taught Sunday School, lead the Youth Group, lit candles, went to confession (when I had to – but more on that later), met the Pope, and generally helped out wherever I could. As time passed however, I began to fell more and more like I was talking at the ceiling.
Our old house had those old fashioned pressed ceilings, and I spent many nights starting at them talking to a God who, increasingly, wasn’t talking back. I began to wonder if He ever had.
Then, in the June of my 19th year, my father came home from work one Monday evening. I showed him my first report card from university. He looked it over, smiled, told me how proud he was, and fell over dead.
I reached for my faith, I said all the prayers, I made votive deals with God, and I beat on my father’s chest for 45 minutes until the ambulance arrived. An hour later, they wheeled his body out of the house. My faith hadn’t worked.
Somehow I knew it wasn’t supposed to: God’s plan and all that. Somehow I knew I couldn’t be angry with either Catholicism or God. It wasn’t either of their faults. No amount of faith could have saved him, no matter what mustard seed theory you may have. Years of chain smoking, steak lunches and heavy drinking overruled any votive wish on my part.  
I also knew that this whole Catholic thing didn’t work for me anymore. It didn’t make me understand any better, it didn’t make me feel any better, it didn’t make me better at comforting my mother, and it certainly didn't make me feel closer to God. It was in that moment that I finally started to understand that chapter in that book I had read all those years ago. It was in that moment that I finally became a Buddhist.
*******************************************************************
The basic tenents of Buddhsim are encapsulated in two lists: the Four Noble Truths and the Eight Fold Path. The four Noble Truths are these:
1.       In life, you experience suffering
2.       Your suffering comes from your attachments
3.       There is a way out of your attachments
4.       The Buddha found a way
These made absolute perfect sense to me, not in the least because they require absolutely no leap of faith whatsoever; an absolute 180 degree turn in my practice of living.
“In life, you experience suffering”: well, this is true. We all do. No faith required here.
“Your suffering comes from your attachments”: well that makes sense. If I didn’t care about my father, or I wasn’t “attached” to him, I wouldn’t have suffered at all. No leap of faith here either.
“There is a way out of your attachments”: well: if there is a way in, there has to be a way out. Surely?
And as for the “Buddha found a way”, well this isn’t so much a leap of faith as it is a: “I’ll give it a try”. The Buddha also made this easy. One of my favourite quotes from him is this:
                Use what I’ve taught you, and when you are done using it, throw it away
He never claimed to have the only way, just A way. I could live with this.
Basically, what was presented to me at that moment of staring at the ceiling was a different way of understanding why we are here, what the point is, and where we are going. I grabbed it with both hands.
The way the Buddha described is known as the Eight Fold Path. This list, yes another list: Buddhism is nothing if not practical, is as follows:
1.       Right View
2.       Right Intention
3.       Right Speech
4.       Right Action
5.       Right Livelihood
6.       Right Effort
7.       Right Mindfulness
8.       Right Concentration
So, what I was understanding here, in it’s very basic form, is that by having the right, view, intentions, speech, action, livelihood, effort, mindfulness and concentration, I could completely alter my experience of the world. Worth a shot I thought.
*******************************************************************
(You’ll notice there is no mention of God in these lists. That’s important. We’ll talk about that later.)







Monday, 4 July 2011

Theosophical Anthropology: The Distance to Here

To start off with, perhaps I should explain my approach here, considering I have already been slated for “going straight to hell!!!” (Yes: that actually happened after the last blog on evolution. Fundamentalism: it breeds, first and foremost, no sense of humour.)

My personal philosophy, and feel free to disagree here, is this:

If God is an entity with a personality, and we all interact with that personality on various levels of intimacy, then surely our experience and understanding of God is an individual thing? For example: if you only know your Boss in a workplace situation and he runs his business with a tight management structure; you may consider him to be stern and petty. His wife however, experiences him at home. If, when he gets home, he is more accommodating and mellow, then she will have a completely different view of him. Is one more right than the other? Or are these just aspects of the same person?

Similarly with God: as I have travelled further down this journey to get to know Him (assuming He is a Him of course), I have learned different things about Him. Indeed, my concept of God has changed many times as I’ve learned and experienced different things.

This developmental approach to God has permeated even conventional Christianity. How you perceive God as a child is very different to how you perceive God as an adult. How you perceive God as an armchair Christian will be very different to how you perceive God if you actually study the Bible (or the Koran, Dharma, Talmud etc...)

Now, of course, I am going to be crucified by some for the perceived: “all religions are a path to God” platitude. I must emphasise: I don’t believe that. Or maybe I do? I haven’t decided yet. My journey to get to know my friend God is not over. But what I have seen is that getting to know God is a process. Just like getting to know anybody else. (Even taking just the Bible as a source: it seems evident to me that God has several distinct personalities or moods in the years chronicled by the book. He is Loving Creator, Largely Ambivalent, The Destroyer of Nations, and the Saviour all in one tome. This would suggest to me that God is not as consistent as we often imagine. Like any other ‘person’ interacting with other ‘people’ he seems to go through phases. (This is often explained as being part of “God’s Plan”, but if there is a plan, and there is nothing we can do to alter this plan, then why do we pray for things? Why don’t we simply skip ahead to: “God’s Plan” and simply wait out the results? But that is another question for another day.)

So in a nutshell: here’s where I’m coming from: I was born onto this planet as a human being. I was raised to believe that there is a God, who made me, looks after things and generally keeps things in line. At some point, I realised that:

If there is a God, I was doing a pretty terrible job of getting to know this entity that went to all the trouble of making me in the first place,

That ambivalence was at best rude, at worst, if many of the religions are to be believed, a one way ticket to a very uncomfortable, fiery end,

That perhaps this was all hokum and yet another way society has developed to keep us in line.


Now I would have loved to have been able to just accept this whole “God” thing as it came, God knows that would have been much easier, but it just wasn’t in me. If I was to get to know God, I had to be sure I wasn’t just talking at the ceiling. That’s where Theosophical Anthropology came about for me. I needed to understand:

Why do we as humans have such a yearning for God?

Where did this yearning come from?

What, if any, is the point of all of this?

And who is this “God” person anyway? (With great respect to Douglas Adams!)


Taking a Post-Modern approach: I would look for answers without seeking to find them, I would read anything that came my way, mindful of my preconception or judgement, and I would try to live what I was reading. My research still takes this form. Thanks to this approach, I have studied Ancient Greek and Latin, read so many books my toes hurt, and have, at one point or another studied: Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, the Verdic Scriptures, Krishna Consciousness/Bhakti Yoga, Shiva Worship, Satanism, polytheism, the mystery cults, early Christianity, medieval Christianity, modern Christianity, the occult, Sat Sang, Theosophy, various cosmologies (plenty more on that later), African mythology, and a host of other marginal beliefs. This blog is my way of starting to put it all together.


*************************************************************

Thanks for joining me on this journey! Read on by clicking here: http://talkingattheceiling.blogspot.com/2011/09/betting-on-buddha.html

*************************************************************

Tuesday, 14 June 2011

Evolutionary Christianity

Last night I was listening to Talk Radio, and someone texted in to ask the DJ:

“Can you still be a Christian and believe in Evolution?”

The DJ answered quickly with a matter of fact: “No” and moved on to the next topic. For reasons that will become clear in the course of this blog, and future ones, this irritated the hell out of me! As I started dialling in to address this guy, he ended his show. So I present here the fictional conversation we may have had:

In your Philosophy, God created the world and everything in it, right? So he made the sun, moon, trees, air, water and everything else? He also designed it so that liquid behaves like a liquid, right? That is, he made it with the characteristic that it would flow downwards to the lowest point thanks to another of his creations; Gravity?

This is truly remarkable! We take it for granted, of course, because we are used to it, but it is truly amazing. Quick question: where in the Bible does it explain this phenomenon? Which book deals with the intricacies of fluid dynamics? None?

Similarly, God created electricity! He designed all matter using tiny building blocks we now understand as atoms. We also now can describe and utilise various parts of the atom: we know that electricity is the flow of electrons from one atom to the next; we can explain how this ingenious creation works. Amazing! Another question: where in the Bible does it explain electricity?

Neither of these phenomenon are explained in the Bible because that is not the purpose of the book! The Bible is an answer to the big “Why” question of life. It gives purpose and meaning, hope and instruction for living. It is not a catalogue of “How”. How does water flow as it does? Well, scientific method has explained the difference between solids, liquids and gasses. How did God make electrical charge occur? Again, scientific enquiry has shown us the answer of the electron. Neither of these answers rules out the hand of God in creation, they just explain how He did may have done it. The evolution debate is a similar scenario: a potential answer to the how, not the why.

So why then is the evolution debate a more contentious one? Why do people get upset about this explanation of the “How” and not the others? Is it because the theory insinuates we evolved from monkeys, and according to Christian philosophy we are made “in Gods image”? Is it because: “God is not a monkey!!!”? Again, surely this is faulty logic? Manufacturing processes involve many stages; couldn’t the manufacture of the human species have involved many stages? (And isn’t this self-important notion of the human species hubris in the first place? (Particularly considering Gods own admitted love of even the lowly Sparrow.))

Surely denying evolution out-right is tantamount to saying:

“I believe God created me. I don’t know how he did it, but it definitely wasn’t like that!”

Another question: why not? Why not that way? Can any human claim to understand the mind and workings of God?

On the other hand: why does the other side of the argument cling so strongly to the idea? 800 years ago we knew the earth was flat; we KNEW it! What will we know tomorrow?

Maybe its time we stopped fighting about these things and started getting excited about the possibilities of learning and understanding the universe we live in. Maybe it’s time we stopped getting scared every time our conceptions were challenged. Maybe its time we realised we don’t know all that much yet. Maybe its time to understand what the difference is between religion and science, where these things meet, and why we need both of them.

*************************************************************

Thanks for joining me on this journey! Read on by clicking here: http://talkingattheceiling.blogspot.com/2011/07/theosophical-anthropology-distance-to.html

*************************************************************